| Contrast ratio | 2351:1 |
|---|---|
| Monitor model | Philips 220SW8 |
| Submitted | 10 Apr 2009 18:14 CEST, by 77.71.*.* |
| Camera model | Pentax K100D |
| Processing remarks | Warning: image file 2: exposure time below 1/500 sec is unreliable. Try increasing the EV compensation. |
| Black | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 0.05 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 0.02 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –2.78 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 0.63 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 1 x 1 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 0.6 ISO: 800 F-number: 1.4 Focal length: 75 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 1 |
| White | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 119 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 38 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –2.49 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 0.46 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 1 x 1 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/3200 ISO: 800 F-number: 1.4 Focal length: 75 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 1 |
![[open image]](upload/cr005/01420a.jpg){kind=link}
![[open image]](upload/cr005/01420b.jpg){kind=link}
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.