| Contrast ratio | 1035:1 |
|---|---|
| Monitor model | xg2401 |
| Submitted | 22 Nov 2019 16:50 CET, by 94.54.*.* |
| Camera model | Canon PowerShot A590 IS |
| Processing remarks | Note: image file 1: suggested exposure time: 5.5 s (Set EV to +1.1) |
| Black | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 0.09 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 0.05 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –3.63 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 0.87 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 0.495 x 0.495 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 2.5 ISO: 200 F-number: 2.6 Focal length: 34.3 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
| White | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 97 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 10 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –2.25 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 0.15 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 0.495 x 0.495 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/159 ISO: 200 F-number: 2.6 Focal length: 34.3 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
![[open image]](upload/cr055/13852a.jpg){kind=link}
![[open image]](upload/cr055/13852b.jpg){kind=link}
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.