Contrast ratio | 640:1 |
---|---|
Monitor model | DELL XPS 1640 |
Submitted | 05 Sep 2010 00:48 CEST, by 201.148.*.* |
Camera model | Canon PowerShot SX120 IS |
Processing remarks | Note: image file 1: suggested exposure time: 0.7 s (Set EV to +1.3) |
Black | |
Screen photo |
|
Luminance | 0.4 cd/m2 |
Luminance spread | 0.15 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
Exposure value | –3.81 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
Exposure spread | 0.54 stops |
Area used for calculation | 0.508 x 0.508 |
Camera settings | Exposure time: 0.3 ISO: 400 F-number: 2.8 Focal length: 35.2 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
White | |
Screen photo |
|
Luminance | 255 cd/m2 |
Luminance spread | 31 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
Exposure value | –1.41 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
Exposure spread | 0.18 stops |
Area used for calculation | 0.508 x 0.508 |
Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/403 ISO: 400 F-number: 2.8 Focal length: 35.2 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.