Contrast ratio | 2:1 (edge: 511:1) |
---|---|
Monitor model | xg2401 |
Submitted | 10 Nov 2019 04:10 CET, by 94.54.*.* |
Camera model | Canon PowerShot A590 IS |
Processing remarks | image file 3: Note: image seems to be noisy. Try reducing the ISO setting or increasing the exposure time. |
Black | |
Screen photo |
|
Luminance | 25 cd/m2 |
Luminance spread | 5 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
Exposure value | –1.8 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
Exposure spread | 0.31 stops |
Area used for calculation | 0.495 x 0.495 |
Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/60 ISO: 400 F-number: 2.6 Focal length: 34.3 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
White | |
Screen photo |
|
Luminance | 53 cd/m2 |
Luminance spread | 12 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
Exposure value | –1.76 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
Exposure spread | 0.34 stops |
Area used for calculation | 0.495 x 0.495 |
Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/125 ISO: 400 F-number: 2.6 Focal length: 34.3 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
Black at screen edge | |
Screen photo |
|
Luminance | 0.1 cd/m2 |
Luminance spread | 0.04 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
Exposure value | –3.79 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
Exposure spread | 0.55 stops |
Area used for calculation | 0.495 x 0.495 |
Camera settings | Exposure time: 1 ISO: 400 F-number: 2.6 Focal length: 34.3 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.