Contrast ratio | 377:1 |
---|---|
Monitor model | Philips Brilliance 200W |
Submitted | 24 Feb 2009 02:48 CET, by 86.145.*.* |
Camera model | Canon PowerShot S3 IS |
Processing remarks | Note: image file 1: suggested exposure time: 2.8 s (Set EV to +1.5) |
Black | |
Screen photo |
|
Luminance | 0.2 cd/m2 |
Luminance spread | 0.08 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
Exposure value | –3.99 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
Exposure spread | 0.56 stops |
Area used for calculation | 0.513 x 0.513 |
Camera settings | Exposure time: 1 ISO: 200 F-number: 2.7 Focal length: 35.5 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
White | |
Screen photo |
|
Luminance | 74 cd/m2 |
Luminance spread | 11 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
Exposure value | –4.08 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
Exposure spread | 0.22 stops |
Area used for calculation | 0.513 x 0.513 |
Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/403 ISO: 200 F-number: 2.7 Focal length: 35.5 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.